Salts of Isophosphoramide Mustard and Analogs Thereof

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are crystalline compounds of formula (I) 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
         
         
           
             wherein A +  represents a hydroxylated aliphatic ammonium species; and X and Y independently represent leaving groups.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication Ser. No. 60/922,148 filed on Apr. 6, 2007, U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/927,363 filed on May 2, 2007, U.S.Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/934,914 filed on Jun. 15,2007 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/001,237 filedon Oct. 30, 2007. The teachings of all of the referenced applicationsare incorporated by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Autopsies of soldiers killed by mustard gas in World War I indicatedthat sulfur mustard has a disproportionate effect on rapidly dividingcells and suggested that sulfur mustard compounds might have antitumoreffects. Indeed, early researchers attempted to treat cancer by directinjection of sulfur mustard into tumors. This research was limited bythe extreme toxicity of sulfur mustard compounds and nitrogen mustardanalogs, such as mechlorethamine, were investigated as less toxicalternatives.

Because of the lack of selectivity of most mechlorethamine analogs,prodrugs, such as phosphoramide compounds, which can be activated by thehigh concentration of phosphoramidases present in neoplastic cells, havebeen investigated. Two phosphoramide alkylating agents, cyclophosphamide(CPA) and the isomeric compound Ifosfamide (Ifos) have proved to beparticularly effective.

With reference to FIG. 1, isophosphoramide mustard (IPM) is a commonmetabolite of CPA and Ifos. IPM is thought to be responsible for atleast a portion of the anti-tumor activity exhibited by CPA and Ifos.Efforts to use IPM as an anticancer agent directly have beenunsuccessful due in part to the compound's instability. IPM has beensynthesized and preliminary biological evaluations of the compound havebeen conducted, but unfortunately IPM is too unstable to be isolated andused for human treatment.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed herein are crystalline compounds of formula (I)

wherein A⁺ represents an aliphatic ammonium species; and X and Yindependently represent leaving groups.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to pharmaceuticalcompositions, comprising a compound of formula (I) and apharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. Methods of preparingsuch compounds and compositions are also described.

Also disclosed herein are a lyophilisate and a method for producing alyophilisate comprising isophosphoramide mustard (IPM) and/or an IPManalog, one or more equivalents of a base, and an excipient. In certainembodiments, the method comprises contacting a crystalline salt of IPMor an analog thereof and an aliphatic amine, such astris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), or a mixture of IPM or an analogthereof and one or more aliphatic amines (preferably in a ratio of about1:1 of IPM or analog thereof to the amine or amines) with water andlyophilizing the resulting mixture. In certain embodiments, the mixtureand the resulting lyophilisate comprise an excipient, such as mannitol,anhydrous lactose, sucrose, D(+)-trehalose, dextran 40 or povidone (PVPK24), preferably mannitol.

Such formulations include lyophilisates, preferably comprising anexcipient, such as mannitol, anhydrous lactose, sucrose, D(+)-trehalose,dextran 40 or povidone (PVP K24), preferably mannitol, and a compound ofthe formula

wherein A⁺ represents an ammonium species selected from the protonated(conjugate acid) or quaternary forms of aliphatic amines and aromaticamines, including basic amino acids, heterocyclic amines, substitutedand unsubstituted pyridines, guanidines and amidines; and X and Yindependently represent leaving groups.

Also disclosed herein are pharmaceutical compositions adapted for oraladministration, comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent orexcipient and a compound as disclosed herein.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to methods for thetreatment of hyperproliferative disorders, e.g., with the compounds orformulations discussed herein. In certain such embodiments, theinvention relates to the treatment of a hyperproliferative disorderselected from leukemias, including acute leukemias (such as acutelymphocytic leukemia, acute myelocytic leukemia, acute myelogenousleukemia and myeloblastic, promyelocytic, myelomonocytic, monocytic anderythroleukemia), chronic leukemias (such as chronic myelocytic(granulocytic) leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, and chroniclymphocytic leukemia), polycythemia vera, lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease,non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (indolent and high grade forms), multiplemyeloma, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, heavy chain disease,myelodysplastic syndrome, hairy cell leukemia and myelodysplasia.

Additional examples of conditions that may be treated using thedisclosed compounds and compositions include solid tumors, such assarcomas and carcinomas, including, but not limited to fibrosarcoma,myxosarcoma, liposarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma,cyclophosphamide-resistant sarcomas, and other sarcomas, synovioma,mesothelioma, Ewing's tumor, leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, coloncarcinoma, lymphoid malignancy, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, lungcancers, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma,squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sweatgland carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, papillary carcinoma,papillary adenocarcinomas, medullary carcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma,renal cell carcinoma, hepatoma, bile duct carcinoma, choriocarcinoma,Wilms' tumor, cervical cancer, testicular tumor, bladder carcinoma, andCNS tumors (such as a glioma, astrocytoma, medulloblastoma,craniopharyogioma, ependymoma, pinealoma, hemangioblastoma, acousticneuroma, oligodendroglioma, menangioma, melanoma, neuroblastoma andretinoblastoma).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a scheme illustrating the metabolism of ifosfamide includingthe production of acrolein and isophosphoramide mustard.

FIG. 2 shows the X-ray powder diffraction of IPM•Tris.

FIG. 3 shows differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of IPM•Tris.

FIG. 4 shows thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of IPM•Tris.

FIG. 5 shows scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of crystallineIPM•Tris.

FIG. 6 shows a comparison of IPM•(LYS)₂ with IPM•Tris in human MX-1breast cancer xenografts.

FIG. 7 shows a comparison of anti-tumor activity of IP and oraladministration of IPM•Tris in human MX-1 breast cancer xenografts.

FIG. 8 a shows the viability of RD and RH30 rhabdomyosarcoma cells whentreated with IPM•(LYS)₂ at various concentrations.

FIG. 8 b shows the viability of SKES1 and SKPNDW Ewing's sarcoma cellswhen treated with IPM•(LYS)₂ at various concentrations.

FIG. 8 c shows the viability of OS230, OS229, OS222, and SaOSosteosarcoma cells when treated with IPM•(LYS)₂ at variousconcentrations.

FIG. 8 d shows the viability of SYO1 and HSSYII synovial sarcoma cellswhen treated with IPM•(LYS)₂ at various concentrations.

FIG. 9 a shows the viability of RH30 rhabdomyosarcoma cells when treatedwith IPM•(LYS)₂ at various concentrations either once a day or threetimes a day.

FIG. 9 b shows the viability of OS229 osteosarcoma cells when treatedwith IPM•(LYS)₂ at various concentrations either once a day or threetimes a day.

FIG. 10 shows that administration at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) inthe cyclophosphamide-resistant 0531 osteosarcoma cell line implanted inCB 17 female scid*/* mice for each of three dose schedules (control, 175mg/kg daily ×1, or 100 mg/kg daily ×3), IPM•(LYS)₂ results insignificant tumor growth delay.

FIG. 11 a shows cyclophosphamide resistance in OS31 osteosarcoma cellsimplanted in CB 17 female scid*/* mice in terms of the relative tumorvolume, where treatment comprises administration of cyclophosphamide ascompared to the control.

FIG. 11 b shows cyclophosphamide resistance in OS33 osteosarcoma cellsimplanted in CB17 female scid*/* mice in terms of the relative tumorvolume, where treatment comprises administration of IPM•(LYS)₂ ascompared to the control.

FIG. 12 shows the activity of IPM•(LYS)₂ in terms of relative tumorvolume in the treatment of cyclophosphosphamide resistant OS31osteosarcoma cells implanted in CB17 female scid*/* mice (100 mg/kgdaily ×3 compared to control).

FIG. 13 shows the response of SC MX-1 mammary tumors to IP and oraltreatment with saline with a dose of q1d×5.

FIG. 14 shows the response of SC MX-1 mammary tumors to IP treatmentwith IPM•Tris, IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂ with a dose of q1d×5.

FIG. 15 shows the response of SC MX-1 mammary tumors to oral treatmentwith IPM•Tris, IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂ with a dose of q1d×5.

FIG. 16 shows the response of SC MX-1 mammary tumors to IP and oraltreatment with saline with a dose of q1d×5.

FIG. 17 shows the response of SC MX-1 mammary tumors to IP treatmentwith IPM•Tris, IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂ with a dose of q1d×5.

FIG. 18 shows the response of SC MX-1 mammary tumors to oral treatmentwith IPM•Tris, IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂ with a dose of q1d×5.

FIG. 19 shows the effect of MX-1 breast cancer tumors to treatment withIPM•Tris in combination with doxorubicin with a dose of 12 mg/kg/dayIPM•Tris Q1D×5 and 8 mg/kg doxorubicin Q4D×3.

FIG. 20 shows the effect on survival of IPM•Tris in combination withdoxorubicin with a dose of 12 mg/kg/day IPM•Tris Q1D×5 and 8 mg/kgdoxorubicin Q4D×3.

FIG. 21 shows the effect on MX-1 breast cancer tumors of treatment withIPM•Tris in combination with doxorubicin with a dose of 24 mg/kg/dayIPM•Tris Q1D×5 and 8 mg/kg doxorubicin Q4D×3.

FIG. 22 shows the effect on survival of IPM•Tris in combination withdoxorubicin with a dose of 24 mg/kg/day IPM•Tris Q1D×5 and 8 mg/kgdoxorubicin Q4D×3.

FIG. 23 shows the effect on MX-1 breast cancer tumors of treatment withIPM•Tris in combination with doxorubicin with a dose of 54 mg/kg/dayIPM•Tris Q 1 D×5 and 8 mg/kg doxorubicin Q4D×3.

FIG. 24 shows the effect on survival of IPM•Tris in combination withdoxorubicin with a dose of 54 mg/kg/day IPM•Tris Q1D×5 and 8 mg/kgdoxorubicin Q4D×3.

FIG. 25 shows the toxicity of IPM•Tris/doxorubicin combination regimen.

FIG. 26 shows the effect on MX-1 breast cancer tumors of treatment withIPM•Tris in combination with docetaxel with a dose of 54 mg/kg IPM•TrisQ1D×5 IP and 10 mg/kg docetaxel Q6D×3 IV.

FIG. 27 shows the effect on MX-1 breast cancer tumors of treatment withIPM•Tris administered either at a dose of 36 mg/kg IP or at a dose of 81mg/kg PO.

FIG. 28 shows the effect on survival of IPM•Tris administered either ata dose of 36 mg/kg IP or at a dose of 81 mg/kg PO.

FIG. 29 shows the pharmacokinetics of oral and IV administered IPM•Trisin female Sprague-Dawley rats.

FIG. 30 shows the AUC with increasing doses of PO- or IV-administeredIPM•Tris.

FIG. 31 shows the C_(max) with increasing doses of PO- orIV-administered IPM•Tris.

FIG. 32 shows the solution stability of IPM in pH 7.0 buffer at 25° C.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION I. IPM Salts and Analogs Thereof

The compositions disclosed herein include crystalline IPM salts oranalogs thereof. In certain embodiments, the disclosed salts include oneor more cations. In certain embodiments, the cations can be a conjugateacid of an amine base or can be a quaternary ammonium cation.

In certain embodiments, the disclosed crystalline compounds comprisesalts of IPM or an analog thereof. Such compounds include crystallinecompounds of formula (I)

wherein A⁺ represents an ammonium species selected from the protonated(conjugate acid) or quaternary forms of hydroxylated aliphatic amines;and X and Y independently represent leaving groups. In certainembodiments, X and Y are independently halogen. Preferably X and Y arethe same. In certain such embodiments, X and Y are both Cl.

Particular examples of suitable conjugate acids of amine bases include,without limitation, the conjugate acid of mono-, bis- ortris-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, 2-hydroxy-tert-butylamine,N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, andtris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris). In certain such embodiments, A⁺is the conjugate acid of Tris.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to a compound comprising acrystalline salt of IPM or analog thereof wherein the IPM or analogthereof, and the counterion, preferably Tris, are present in a ratiofrom 2:1 to 1:2, preferably 1:1. In certain embodiments, the crystallinecomposition comprises more than one polymorphic form of crystals, suchas two, three, four, or even five polymorphic forms of crystals. Incertain alternative such embodiments, the crystalline compositioncomprises a single polymorphic form of crystals. In certain embodiments,such salts are more stable than IPM and IPM analogs as free acids.

In certain such embodiments, the compound is a crystalline salt of a 1:1ratio of IPM and Tris. In certain such embodiments, the melting point ofthe crystalline solid is between about 100 and about 110° C., about 102to about 108° C., about 103 to about 106° C., or even 105 to 106° C.

In certain embodiments, the compound, e.g., a crystalline salt of a 1:1ratio of IPM and Tris, is at least about 80% pure, at least about 85%pure, at least 90% pure, at least 95% pure, at least 97% pure, at least98% pure, or even at least 99% pure. In certain such embodiments, nosingle impurity exceeds 1% by weight. In certain embodiments, purity ismeasured relative to all other components of the composition, while inother embodiments (e.g., where the compound is part of a pharmaceuticalcomposition or lyophilisate mixture), purity may be measured relative todegradation products of the compound (e.g., phosphorous-containingdegradation products of the compound) or by-products of the manufactureof the compound (e.g., phosphorous-containing degradation products ofthe compound), thereby excluding other components purposefully added tothe composition.

In certain embodiments, the compounds are IPM salts or analogs thereof,wherein the salt has a half-life at room temperature (e.g., about 23°C.) in the presence of water that is greater than a half-life of IPM(i.e., as the free acid) in the presence of water under the sameconditions. In certain such embodiments, an IPM salt has a half-life inthe presence of water that is equal to or greater than twice as long asIPM itself in the presence of water, more preferably, equal to orgreater than five times.

In certain embodiments, the compounds are IPM salts and analogs thereof,wherein the salts are stable at room temperature in the presence ofwater for at least one day, two days, three days, four days, five days,six days, or even a week.

As used herein, the term “stable” means that the purity of the IPM saltor analog thereof after a period of time (e.g., one month, two months,three months, six months, one year, etc.) is at least 90%, at least 95%,at least 97%, or even at least 99% of the initial purity, which may bedetermined e.g., by HPLC using evaporative light scattering detection(ELSD). Such an assay may be performed, for example, using a C18 columnand an isocratic system with a mobile phase comprising 0.005 Mheptafluorobutyric acid and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to lyophilisatescomprising a compound of the formula

wherein A⁺ represents an ammonium species selected from the protonated(conjugate acid) or quaternary forms of aliphatic amines and aromaticamines, including basic amino acids, heterocyclic amines, substitutedand unsubstituted pyridines, guanidines and amidines; and X and Yindependently represent leaving groups.

Particular examples of suitable amine bases (and their correspondingammonium ions) for use in the present compounds include, withoutlimitation, pyridine, N,N-dimethylaminopyridine, diazabicyclononane,diazabicycloundecene, N-methyl-N-ethylamine, diethylamine,triethylamine, diisopropylethylamine, mono-, bis- ortris-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, 2-hydroxy-tert-butylamine,tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine,tri-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine and N-methyl-D-glucamine.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to lyophilisatescomprising compound of the formula

With reference to the formula, B can be, for each n, an independentlyselected basic molecule. In one embodiment of the formula, B can beselected from the basic amino acids, acyclic aliphatic amines, di- andtri alkyl amines, heterocyclic aliphatic amines, aromatic amines,substituted and unsubstituted pyridines, cyclic and acyclic guanidines,and cyclic and acyclic amidines. Typically, n is from 1 to about 3 suchthat the formula can include different basic molecules. With continuedreference to the formula, X and Y are leaving groups. A person ofordinary skill in the art will understand that the illustratedisophosphoramide mustard structure includes an acidic proton, and assuch exists predominantly as its conjugate base at physiological pH andin the presence of a base such as B. Likewise, B, being a basic groupexists predominantly as its conjugate acid at physiological pH and inthe presence of isophosphoramide mustard and isophosphoramide mustardanalogs. Exemplary embodiments of the disclosed compounds are depictedin Table 1.

TABLE 1

B n X Y lysine 2 Cl Cl NH₃ 2 Cl Cl cyclohexylamine 2 Cl ClN-methyl-D-glucamine 2 Cl Cl N,N-dimethylaminopyridine 1 Cl Cl arginine2 Cl Cl lysine 2 Cl —SO₂CH₃ lysine 2 Br —SO₂CH₃tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane 1 Cl Cl

II. Compositions and Methods

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising an IPM salt or analog thereof and apharmaceutical diluent or excipient. In certain such embodiments, thepharmaceutical composition is a solution, preferably a saline solutioncomprising IPM or an IPM analog. In certain such embodiments, theconcentration of the IPM salt or IPM analog salt in solution is fromabout 3 mg/mL to about 30 mg/mL or even greater. Such saline solutionsmay be prepared, for example, by dissolving a crystalline compound offormula (I) or a lyophilisate of IPM or an IPM analog as disclosedherein in a saline solution, e.g., while stirring at room temperature.In certain such embodiments, the saline solution is prepared such thatthe sodium chloride concentration is about 0.5%, 0.9%, 2.5%, 2.7%, 3.0%,4.0%, or even 5.0%.

In certain embodiments, an aqueous solution may be prepared from acrystalline compound of formula I or a lyophilisate of IPM or an IPManalog as disclosed herein. Such an aqueous solution (e.g., in water orin an isotonic saline solution) is stable at room temperature for atleast about 60 minutes, 80 minutes, 100 minutes, 120 minutes, 140minutes, or even about 160 minutes at room temperature.

In certain embodiments, a crystalline compound of formula (I), such as asalt of IPM and Tris, has a solubility in water of at least about 30mg/mL, 40 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, 60 mg/mL, 70 mg/mL, or even 80 mg/mL. Incertain embodiments a crystalline compound of formula (I), such as asalt of IPM and Tris, has a solubility in water of at least about atleast about 200 mg/mL, at least about 500 mg/mL, at least about 800mg/mL, at least about 1000 mg/mL, at least about 1200 mg/mL, or even atleast 1400 mg/mL. In certain embodiments, the pH of a solution of thecrystalline compound in water is between about 4.5 and about 10, such asbetween about 5.0 and 8.5, preferably between about 5.0 and about 7.0.In certain embodiments, the pH of such a solution is about 5.0.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to a kit, comprising acrystalline compound of formula I and a saline solution.

The lyophilisates disclosed herein include IPM and IPM analogs that areformulated with one or more equivalents of a base. Because IPM and itsanalogs are acid labile and are acidic, the presently disclosedlyophilisates offer greater stability as well as other advantages. Theadvantages of the disclosed formulations in terms of synthesis,stability and bioavailability will be apparent to those of ordinaryskill in the art upon consideration of the present disclosure.Additional advantages of the IPM and IPM analogs that are formulatedwith one or more equivalents of a base may include increased solubilityin water or bodily fluids.

In certain embodiments, the disclosed lyophilisates are salts ofisophosphoramide mustard or isophosphoramide mustard analogs includingone or more cations. In certain embodiments, the cations can be aconjugate acid of an amine base or can be a quaternary ammonium cation.Suitable counterions for isophosphoramide mustard and its analogsinclude the conjugate acids (as used herein terms that refer to aminesshould be understood to include their conjugate acids unless the contextclearly indicates that the free amine is intended) of bases includingbasic amino acids, aliphatic amines, heterocyclic amines, aromaticamines, pyridines, guanidines and amidines. Of the aliphatic amines, theacyclic aliphatic amines, and cyclic and acyclic di- and tri-alkylamines are particularly suitable for use in the disclosed compounds. Inaddition, quaternary ammonium counterions are examples of suitablecounterions that can be used. In certain embodiments, such alyophilisate may further comprise an excipient. Suitable excipientsinclude, but are not limited to, mannitol, anhydrous lactose, sucrose,D(+)-trehalose, dextran 40 and povidone (PVP K24).

In certain embodiments, the compounds and compositions, such as thelyophilisates disclosed herein, are stable at room temperature for atleast two weeks, at least three weeks, at least a month, at least twomonths, at least three months, or even at least six months. In certainembodiments, the salts are stable at lower temperatures (e.g., 0° C., 2°C., 4° C., 6° C., etc.) for at least two weeks, at least three weeks, atleast a month, at least two months, at least three months, or even atleast six months. In certain such embodiments, the compounds andcompositions, such as the lyophilisates, are stable for at least onemonth, at least two months, at least four months, or even at least sixmonths at a lower temperature (e.g., between about 0° C. and about 20°C., between about 0° C. and about 10° C., or even between about 2° C.and about 8° C.). In certain embodiments, the lyophilisate comprises anIPM salt or an analog thereof. In certain embodiments, the lyophilisatecomprises IPM•Tris or IPM(LYS)₂, preferably IPM•Tris, and inparticularly preferred embodiments, such compositions further comprise abulking agent, such as mannitol.

In a further embodiment, the salts described above can include a secondamine or ammonium group. In one embodiment, the lyophilisates disclosedherein include more than one equivalent of an amine for each equivalentof isophosphoramide mustard or isophosphoramide mustard analog. Suchembodiments include those having non-integer ratios of amine toisophosphoramide mustard or isophosphoramide mustard analogs. In certainembodiments, the lyophilisates have a two to one or three to one ratioof amine to isophosphoramide mustard or an isophosphoramide mustardanalog. In working embodiments, salts were produced containing twoequivalents of amine base per equivalent of isophosphoramide mustard. Incertain embodiments, an amine base used to form isophosphoramide mustardand isophosphoramide mustard analog salts includes more than one aminogroup; such bases can be termed “multibasic.” More specifically, certainexamples of multibasic bases that can be used have two amino groups;such compounds can be referred to as “dibasic.” For example, onesuitable dibasic molecule is N,N-dimethylaminopyridine, which includestwo basic amino groups. Certain embodiments of a lyophilisate disclosedherein include isophosphoramide mustard or an isophosphoramide mustardanalog and one equivalent of a dibasic amine.

Certain isophosphoramide mustard and isophosphoramide mustard analoglyophilisates disclosed herein include two leaving groups. Withoutlimitation to theory, it is believed that the two leaving groups aredisplaced in vivo by biomolecular nucleophiles, such as nucleic acidsand proteins, thereby cross-linking the biomolecules. The term “leavinggroup” refers to a group that can be displaced by a nucleophile. Withreference to the presently disclosed compounds, leaving group refers toa group that can be displaced to form an aziridinium intermediate, orcan be directly displaced by a biomolecular nucleophile, such as anucleic acid nucleophile, to form, for example, a 7-alkylatedguanidinium species. Examples of suitable leaving groups include thehalogens and the sulfonates (—SO₂R). In one embodiment of the disclosedisophosphoramide analog salts, the compound is a “mixed” leaving groupcompound, including two different types of leaving groups, for example ahalogen and a sulfonate or two different halogens, such as a bromide anda chloride. U.S. Pat. No. 6,197,760 to Struck teaches methods for makingsuch mixed leaving group compounds.

In certain embodiments, lyophilisates of disclosed salts improve thereconstitutional stability as compared to a lyophilized preparation ofisophosphoramide mustard itself. In certain such embodiments, alyophilisate prepared from disclosed salts of IPM or an analog thereofand an excipient, such as from IPM or an analog thereof and Tris,optionally including an excipient, e.g., a bulking agent, such asmannitol, that has been reconstituted in a saline solution (preferably5% sodium chloride) maintains >90% potency for at least about 30minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 140 minutes, or even atleast about 160 minutes.

In certain such embodiments, dissolving a salt of IPM or an analogthereof, such as IPM•Tris, or a lyophilisate prepared from a salt of IPMor an analog thereof, such as IPM•Tris, and an optional excipient, e.g.,a bulking agent, such as mannitol, in a saline solution maintains atleast 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, or even at least 99% purity forat least about 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 3 hours, or even 4.5hours or more at room temperature. In certain embodiments, suchreconstituted solutions are more stable than reconstituted IPM•(LYS)₂solutions under identical conditions. In certain such embodiments, theIPM•(LYS)₂ that has been reconstituted degrades at least 1.25 times asfast, at least 1.5 times as fast, at least twice as fast, or even atleast three or four times as fast as the salt of IPM or analog thereof.

In certain embodiments where the lyophilisate comprises a salt of IPM oran analog thereof and an excipient, such as a lyophilisate comprisingIPM or an analog thereof, Tris, and mannitol, the mixture has asolubility in water of at least about 30 mg/mL, 40 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, 60mg/mL, 70 mg/mL, or even 80 mg/mL.

In certain embodiments, lyophilisates of disclosed salts of IPM or ananalog thereof are more stable than a lyophilized preparation ofisophosphoramide mustard itself, i.e., as the free acid. In certainpreferred such embodiments, the lyophilisate of the disclosed salts havea longer shelf life than a lyophilized preparation of isophosphoramidemustard itself, preferably at least twice as long, more preferably atleast five times as long. In certain embodiments, the lyophilisate isformed from the Tris salt of IPM, which may or may not be crystallineprior to dissolution.

As described above, in certain embodiments, such lyophilisates furthercomprise an excipient, e.g., a bulking agent, preferably mannitol. Incertain embodiments, the lyophilisate comprises a bulking agent selectedfrom mannitol, anhydrous lactose, sucrose, D(+)-trehalose, dextran 40and povidone (PVP K24), preferably mannitol. In certain embodiments,addition of such a bulking agent may improve the stability of thelyophilisate relative to the lyophilisate formulation in the absence ofthe bulking agent. In certain such embodiments, such a lyophilisate isstable at about −70° C., about −20° C., or even 5° C., e.g., over aperiod of one month, two months, three months, six months, nine months,one year, or even two years or more.

In certain such embodiments where the lyophilisate comprises a bulkingagent, such as mannitol, the lyophilisate comprises from about 1% toabout 10%, or about 1% to about 5% (w/v) bulking agent, e.g., mannitol.Prior to lyophilisation or upon reconstitution, such compositions maycomprise from about 15 mg/mL to about 25 mg/mL of IPM, and/or an aminesuch as Tris in a concentration of about 0.5 to about 1.5 M, preferablyin a roughly equimolar amount relative to the IPM. In certainembodiments, when preparing the solution prior to lyophilisation,instead of adding IPM and amine, such as Tris, as separate components,they are added together in the form of a crystalline IPM•Tris salt asdisclosed herein.

In certain embodiments, the invention relates to a kit, comprising alyophilisate as disclosed herein and a saline solution.

The compounds disclosed herein may be administered orally, topically,transdermally, parenterally, via inhalation or spray and may beadministered in dosage unit formulations containing conventionalnon-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, adjuvants and vehicles.

In certain embodiments, parenteral administration of the disclosed IPMsalts and analogs thereof via injection is preferred. In certainembodiments, oral administration of the disclosed IPM salts and analogsthereof is preferred. In certain embodiments, orally (PO) administeredIPM salts and analogs thereof show pharmacokinetic (PK) parameterssimilar to those observed with intravenous (IV) administration. Theagents may be provided in a single dosage or chronically, dependent uponthe particular disease, condition of patient, toxicity of compound andother factors as will be recognized by a person of ordinary skill in theart.

The therapeutically effective amount of the compound or compoundsadministered can vary depending upon the desired effects and the factorsnoted above.

Pharmaceutical compositions for administration to a subject can includecarriers, thickeners, diluents, buffers, preservatives, surface activeagents and the like in addition to the molecule of choice.Pharmaceutical compositions can also include one or more additionalactive ingredients such as antimicrobial agents, anti-inflammatoryagents, anesthetics, and the like. Pharmaceutical formulations caninclude additional components, such as carriers. The pharmaceuticallyacceptable carriers useful for these formulations are conventional.Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, by E. W. Martin, Mack PublishingCo., Easton, Pa., 21st Edition (2006), describes compositions andformulations suitable for pharmaceutical delivery of the compoundsherein disclosed.

In general, the nature of the carrier will depend on the particular modeof administration being employed. For instance, parenteral formulationsusually contain injectable fluids that include pharmaceutically andphysiologically acceptable fluids such as water, physiological saline,balanced salt solutions, aqueous dextrose, glycerol or the like as avehicle. For solid compositions (for example, powder, pill, tablet, orcapsule forms), conventional non-toxic solid carriers can include, forexample, pharmaceutical grades of mannitol, lactose, starch, ormagnesium stearate. In addition to biologically-neutral carriers,pharmaceutical compositions to be administered can contain minor amountsof non-toxic auxiliary substances, such as wetting or emulsifyingagents, preservatives, and pH buffering agents and the like, for examplesodium acetate or sorbitan monolaurate.

In certain embodiments, a disclosed compound is formulated as an oraldosage form, such as a pill, tablet, or capsule. In certain embodiments,the oral dosage form is a capsule.

In certain embodiments, such oral dosage forms comprise at least oneexcipient, glidant, diluent, lubricant, and/or disintegrant. In certainsuch embodiments, suitable excipients, glidants, diluents, lubricants,and/or disintegrants include, but are not limited to, talc, fumedsilicon dioxide, starch, calcium silicate, magnesium carbonate,magnesium oxide, magnesium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate,lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose,dextrose, glucose, sucrose, starch, starch derivatives, calciumcarbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate, magnesium carbonate, magnesiumstearate, calcium stearate, sodium stearyl fumarate, polyethylene glycol4000, polyethylene glycol 6000, sodium benzoate, light mineral oil,hydrogenated vegetable oils, stearic acid, glyceryl behenate, insolubleion exchange resins, sodium starch glycolate, sodiumcarboxymethylcellulose (croscarmellose sodium), gums (e.g., agar, guar,xanthan), alginic acid, sodium alginate, and crospovidone.

In certain such embodiments, the oral dosage form comprises a compoundas disclosed herein and at least one excipient, glidant, diluent,lubricant, and/or disintegrant; preferably at least one excipient,glidant, diluent, lubricant, and/or disintegrant that is suitable forformulation with a hygroscopic active agent. In certain suchembodiments, the oral dosage form comprises at least one excipient,glidant, diluent, lubricant, and/or disintegrant selected frommicrocrystalline cellulose, lactose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose,magnesium stearate, dibasic calcium phosphate, sodium starch glycolate,hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose and mannitol.

In certain embodiments, a disclosed compound is formulated foradministration to a human subject. In aspect of this embodiment thepharmaceutical composition includes from about 0.1 mg/mL to about 250mg/mL, such as from about 20 to about 100 mg/mL of the compound of anIPM salt or analog thereof.

In one aspect, certain embodiments of pharmaceutical compositions areformulated into unit dosage forms. For example such unit dosage formscan contain from about 1 mg to about 100 mg or 100 mg to about 1500 mg,such as from about 5 mg to about 200 mg or 200 mg to about 1500 mg of adisclosed IPM salt or analog thereof per dosage unit. In certainembodiments, a dosage unit may comprise about 15 mg, about 30 mg, about45 mg, about 60 mg, about 75 mg, or even about 77 mg of a disclosed IPMsalt or analog thereof.

It is specifically contemplated in some embodiments that the presentcompounds are delivered via an injected and/or implanted drug depot, forinstance comprising multi-vesicular liposomes such as in DepoFoam(SkyePharma, Inc, San Diego, Calif.) (see, for instance, Chamberlain etal. Arch. Neuro. 1993, 50, 261-264; Katri et al. J. Pharm. Sci. 1998,87, 1341-1346; Ye et al., J. Control Release 2000, 64, 155-166; andHowell, Cancer J. 2001, 7, 219-227).

Methods are disclosed herein for treating conditions characterized byabnormal or pathological proliferative activity or neoplasia byadministering one or more of the disclosed compounds and compositions toa subject.

Conditions that can be treated according to the disclosed method includethose characterized by abnormal cell growth and/or differentiation, suchas cancers and other neoplastic conditions. Typical examples ofproliferative disorders that can be treated using the disclosedcompounds and compositions are listed below.

Examples of hematological tumors that can be treated using the compoundsand compositions disclosed herein include leukemias, including acuteleukemias (such as acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myelocyticleukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia and myeloblastic, promyelocytic,myelomonocytic, monocytic and erythroleukemia), chronic leukemias (suchas chronic myelocytic (granulocytic) leukemia, chronic myelogenousleukemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia), polycythemia vera,lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (indolent and highgrade forms), multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, heavychain disease, myelodysplastic syndrome, hairy cell leukemia andmyelodysplasia.

Additional examples of conditions that may be treated using thedisclosed compounds and compositions include solid tumors, such assarcomas and carcinomas, include fibrosarcoma, myxosarcoma, liposarcoma,chondrosarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, cyclophosphamide (CPA)-resistantsarcomas, and other sarcomas, synovioma, mesothelioma, Ewing's tumor,leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, colon carcinoma, lymphoid malignancy,pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, lung cancers, ovarian cancer, prostatecancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cellcarcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sweat gland carcinoma, sebaceous glandcarcinoma, papillary carcinoma, papillary adenocarcinomas, medullarycarcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, hepatoma, bileduct carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, Wilms' tumor, cervical cancer,testicular tumor, bladder carcinoma, and CNS tumors (such as a glioma,astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, craniopharyogioma, ependymoma, pinealoma,hemangioblastoma, acoustic neuroma, oligodendroglioma, menangioma,melanoma, neuroblastoma and retinoblastoma).

In certain embodiments the compounds disclosed herein are superior toCPA or Ifos alone against CPA and/or Ifos resistant tumor growth.Therefore one aspect of a method disclosed herein includes treating asubject having a CPA and/or Ifos resistant neoplastic condition with anIPM salt or analog thereof disclosed herein.

In some embodiments, the compounds disclosed herein exhibit reducedtoxicity as compared to CPA and/or Ifos. For example, high doses of CPAand/or Ifos may result in increased kidney, bladder, and/or centralnervous system toxicities due to the presence of certain metabolites,such as chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein. In some embodiments, thepresent compounds reduce or avoid production of these or other toxicmetabolites while retaining efficacy. The present compounds thus areable to provide therapeutic treatment while reducing deleteriousside-effects, such as normal kidney, bladder, or central nervous systemcell death, that may be linked to metabolites of CPA and/or Ifos.Accordingly, the present compounds are useful as substitutes for CPAand/or Ifos.

For example, the present compounds are useful in preparing patients forblood cell and bone marrow transplants. CPA and Ifos are often used inblood cell and bone marrow transplants, and the present compoundsrepresent an advantageous alternative, for example, due to the presentcompounds' reduced toxicity profile and/or increased potency.Additionally, the present compounds may also be employed in blood celland bone marrow transplants wherein CPA and Ifos are inappropriate, forexample, where high doses of CPA and Ifos prove too toxic. The presentcompounds may be administered minutes, hours, days, weeks, or monthsprior to the transplant, particularly days or weeks prior to thetransplant. Moreover, the present compounds may be administered insingle, multiple, and/or repeating dosage forms and/or in associationwith other agents in preparation of the blood cell or bone marrowtransplant.

In certain embodiments, the present compounds are useful in conditioningregimens for blood cell and bone marrow transplants, for example, assubstitutes for CPA and/or Ifos. Moreover, the present compounds can beadministered without using protective measures, such as mesna and/orintravenous hydration that are often used in association with CPA andIfos.

In another embodiment, the present compounds may be used in combinationwith CPA and/or Ifos, for example, in preparing patients for blood celland bone marrow transplants and in conditioning regimens for blood celland bone marrow transplants. Compositions comprising one or more of thepresent compounds in combination with CPA and/or Ifos offer additionalbenefits, such as reduced toxicity and/or increased potency, over CPAand/or Ifos alone.

In certain embodiments of the method a subject is administered fromabout 0.2 mg/kg/day to about 20 mg/kg/day of a disclosed IPM salt oranalog thereof. For example, from about 0.5 to about 10 mg/kg/day, suchas from about 1 to about 7.5 mg/kg/day of a disclosed compound can beadministered to a subject.

In certain embodiments, IPM, an analog or a salt thereof is administeredto a subject at a dose (e.g, daily dose) greater than about 1.0 g,greater than about 1.5 g, greater than about 2.0 g, or even greater thanabout 2.5 g. In certain embodiments, the IPM salt is IPM•Tris, e.g., upto about 2.0 g, 2.5 g, or even 3.0 g.

In certain embodiments, IPM or an analog thereof is administered to asubject as a salt such that the dose (e.g., daily dose) of IPM or theanalog thereof (i.e., taking into account only the IPM anion of the saltand discounting the weight of the counterion or other components of thecomposition) is greater than about 0.4 g, greater than about 0.6 g,greater than about 0.8 g, or even greater than about 1.0 g. In certainembodiments, IPM is administered in a composition as disclosed herein ata dose greater than about 0.4 g, greater than about 0.6 g, greater thanabout 0.8 g, or even greater than about 1.0 g, e.g., up to about 2.0 g,2.5 g, or even 3.0 g.

In certain embodiments, a course of an IPM salt or analog thereof maycomprise a total amount of IPM or analog thereof (i.e., taking intoaccount only the IPM anion of the salt and discounting the weight of thecounterion or other components of the composition) that is greater thanabout 0.8 g, greater than about 1.0 g, greater than about 1.5 g, or evengreater than about 2.0 g.

In certain embodiments, a dose of IPM salt or analog thereof may beadministered from once a week, three times a week, five times a week,once a day, or even twice a day, preferably once a day. In certain suchembodiments, a course of an IPM salt or analog thereof may beadministered, where a course is two or more consecutive doses. Incertain embodiments a course of treatment may comprise administering adose of an IPM salt or analog thereof once a day for two, three, four oreven five days, preferably three days. Such doses may be on consecutiveor non-consecutive days.

In certain embodiments, a single dose (e.g., a daily dose) may comprisemore than one dosage form, e.g., a single dose may comprise two or morecapsules, tablets, or pills. In certain embodiments, a daily dosecomprising multiple dosage forms may be administered all at once, orsubsets of the dosage forms may be administered at intervals throughoutthe day.

In another embodiment of the method, a subject is administered a dose(e.g., a daily dose) from about 1 to about 1500 mg/m², such as fromabout 1 to about 700 mg/m², about 5 to about 1000 mg/m², about 5 toabout 700 mg/m², about 5 to about 500 mg/m², about 600 to about 1200mg/m², about 100 to about 1500 mg/m², about 30 to about 600 mg/m², about10 to about 600 mg/m², or from about 10 to about 100 mg/m² of an IPMsalt or analog thereof as disclosed herein. For example, about 10 mg/m²,about 12, or even 14 mg/m².

In certain embodiments of the method for treating hyper-proliferativedisorders disclosed herein, a disclosed compound is administered to asubject on a multiple daily dosing schedule. In such embodiments thecompound is administered on at least two days and on as many as fivedifferent days. In one aspect of multiple daily dosing schedules, thecompound is administered to the subject on consecutive days, such asfrom two to five consecutive days. Alternatively, the compound isadministered to the subject on non-consecutive days, such every otherday.

In certain embodiments of the method one or more additional therapeuticagents is administered to a subject in addition to the presentlydisclosed compounds and compositions. For example, additionaltherapeutic agents can that can be used include microtubule bindingagents, DNA intercalators or cross-linkers, DNA synthesis inhibitors,DNA and/or RNA transcription inhibitors, antibodies, enzymes, enzymeinhibitors, gene regulators, and/or angiogenesis inhibitors.

Microtubule binding agent refers to an agent that interacts with tubulinto stabilize or destabilize microtubule formation thereby inhibitingcell division. Examples of microtubule binding agents that can be usedin conjunction with IPM, an analog, or a salt thereof include, withoutlimitation, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, vindesine, vinorelbine(navelbine), the epothilones, colchicine, dolastatin 15, nocodazole,podophyllotoxin and rhizoxin. Analogs and derivatives of such compoundsalso can be used and will be known to those of ordinary skill in theart. For example, suitable epothilones and epothilone analogs forincorporation into the present compounds are described in InternationalPublication No. WO 2004/018478, which is incorporated herein byreference. Taxoids, such as paclitaxel and docetaxel are currentlybelieved to be particularly useful as therapeutic agents in thepresently disclosed compounds. Examples of additional useful taxoids,including analogs of paclitaxel are taught by U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,860 toHolton, U.S. Pat. No. 5,530,020 to Gurram et al. and U.S. Pat. No.5,912,264 to Wittman et al., each of which is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

Suitable DNA and/or RNA transcription regulators, including, withoutlimitation, actinomycin D, daunorubicin, doxorubicin and derivatives andanalogs thereof also are suitable for use in combination with thepresently disclosed compounds.

DNA intercalators and cross-linking agents that can be incorporated intothe disclosed compounds include, without limitation, cisplatin,carboplatin, oxaliplatin, mitomycins, such as mitomycin C, bleomycin,chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide and derivatives and analogs thereof.

DNA synthesis inhibitors suitable for use as therapeutic agents include,without limitation, methotrexate, 5-fluoro-5′-deoxyuridine,5-fluorouracil and analogs thereof.

Examples of suitable enzyme inhibitors for use in combination with thepresently disclosed compounds include, without limitation, camptothecin,etoposide, formestane, trichostatin and derivatives and analogs thereof.

Suitable therapeutics for use with the presently disclosed compoundsthat affect gene regulation include agents that result in increased ordecreased expression of one or more genes, such as, without limitation,raloxifene, 5-azacytidine, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, tamoxifen,4-hydroxytamoxifen, mifepristone and derivatives and analogs thereof.

Angiogenesis inhibitors are known in the art and examples of suitableangiogenesis inhibitors include, without limitation, angiostatin K1-3,staurosporine, genistein, fumagillin, medroxyprogesterone, suramin,interferon-alpha, metalloproteinase inhibitors, platelet factor 4,somatostatin, thromobospondin, endostatin, thalidomide, and derivativesand analogs thereof.

Other therapeutic agents, particularly anti-tumor agents, that may ormay not fall under one or more of the classifications above, also aresuitable for administration in combination with the presently disclosedcompounds. By way of example, such agents include adriamycin, apigenin,rapamycin, zebularine, cimetidine, and derivatives and analogs thereof.

In certain embodiments, the IPM salt or analog thereof is administeredin combination with a DNA and/or RNA transcription regulator such asdoxorubicin. In certain alternative embodiments, the IPM salt or analogthereof is administered in combination with a microtubule binding agentsuch as docetaxel or paclitaxel.

In certain embodiments, combinations as described herein may besynergistic in nature, meaning that the therapeutic effect of thecombination of the IPM salt or analog thereof and the other therapeuticagent(s) is greater than the sum of the individual effects when the twoor more agents are administered separately in the same amount.

In certain such embodiments, such a synergistic effect may permitadministration of sub-therapeutic doses of the IPM salt or analogthereof. In certain such embodiments, administration of asub-therapeutic dose may reduce or avoid a side-effect associated withhigher doses of the IPM salt or analog thereof, e.g., the methods of thepresent invention may be advantageous over existing combinationtherapies by allowing conventional anti-cancer agents to exert greatereffect at lower dosage.

In certain embodiments, the efficacy of the additional agent is improvedwhen administered in combination with an IPM salt or analog thereof. Incertain such embodiments, the additional agent is a chemotherapeutic,including, but not limited to, microtubule binding agents, DNAintercalators or cross-linkers, DNA synthesis inhibitors, DNA and/or RNAtranscription inhibitors, antibodies, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, generegulators, and/or angiogenesis inhibitors. In certain such embodiments,the efficacy of a microtubule binding agent, such a docetaxel orpaclitaxel, is improved when administered in combination with an IPMsalt or analog thereof. In certain alternative such embodiments, theefficacy of a DNA and/or RNA transcription inhibitor, such asdoxorubicin, is improved when administered in combination with an IPMsalt or analog thereof. In certain embodiments, the IPM salt or analogthereof is IPM•Tris.

As used herein, the term “sub-therapeutic dose” includes a dose that maystabilize or reduce tumor volume, but would not be considered aneffective treatment at that dose, or even a dose that alone provides nomeasurable therapeutic effect.

In certain embodiments, the IPM salt or analog thereof is administeredat a dose of about 100 mg to about 500 mg, about 150 mg to about 400 mg,or even about 175 mg to about 300 mg. In certain embodiments, the IPMsalt or analog thereof is administered at a dose of about 150 mg, about175 mg, about 185 mg, about 190 mg, about 200 mg, about 225 mg, about250 mg, about 275 mg, about 285 mg, about 290, or even about 300 mg. Incertain such embodiments the IPM salt or analog thereof that isadministered at such doses is administered orally.

In certain such embodiments the IPM salt or analog thereof that isadministered in combination with doxorubicin at a dose of about 100 mgto about 200 mg, about 110 mg to about 180 mg, or even about 115 toabout 150 mg. In certain such embodiments the IPM salt or analog thereofthat is administered in combination with doxorubicin at a dose of about100 mg, about 110 mg, about 115 mg, about 125 mg, about 135 mg, about140 mg, about 145 mg, about 155 mg, about 165 mg, about 175 mg, about185 mg, or even about 200 mg.

In certain such embodiments the IPM salt or analog thereof that isadministered in combination with docetaxel at a dose of about 50 mg toabout 200 g, about 75 mg to about 195 mg, or even about 80 to about 190mg. In certain such embodiments the IPM salt or analog thereof that isadministered in combination with docetaxel at a dose of about 50 mg,about 70 mg, about 80 mg, about 90 mg, about 95 mg, about 100 mg, about110 mg, about 120 mg, about 130 mg, about 140 mg, about 150 mg, about160 mg, about 170 mg, about 180 mg, about 190 mg, or even about 200 mg.

III. Definitions

The following explanations of terms and examples are provided to betterdescribe the present compounds, compositions and methods, and to guidethose of ordinary skill in the art in the practice of the presentdisclosure. It is also to be understood that the terminology used in thedisclosure is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments andexamples only and is not intended to be limiting.

Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value,and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range isexpressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular valueand/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values areexpressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it willbe understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. Itwill be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges aresignificant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently ofthe other endpoint.

The term “acyclic aliphatic amine” refers to an aliphatic amine asabove, wherein at least one of the aliphatic groups is acyclic.

As used herein, “aliphatic amine” refers to a compound of the formulaNR¹R²R³, wherein at least one of R¹⁻³ is an aliphatic group.

The term “angiogenesis inhibitor” is used herein, to mean a moleculeincluding, but not limited to, biomolecules, such as peptides, proteins,enzymes, polysaccharides, oligonucleotides, DNA, RNA, recombinantvectors, and small molecules that function to inhibit blood vesselgrowth. Angiogenesis is implicated in certain pathological processes,such as those involved in disorders such as diabetic retinopathy,chronic inflammatory diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatitis,psoriasis, stomach ulcers, and most types of human solid tumors.

The term “heterocyclic amine” refers to a compound of the formulaNR¹R²R³, wherein at least one of R¹⁻³ is a heterocyclic group or R¹, R²and/or R³ taken together with their common nitrogen atom form a ring.

The term “leaving group” refers to a group that can be displaced by anucleophile. With reference to the presently disclosed compounds,leaving group refers to a group that can be displaced to form anaziridinium intermediate, or can be directly displaced by a biomolecularnucleophile, such as a nucleic acid nucleophile, to form, for example, a7-alkylated guanidinium species. Examples of suitable leaving groupsinclude the halogens and the sulfonates (—SO₂R). In certain embodimentsof the disclosed isophosphoramide analog salts, the compound is a“mixed” leaving group compound, including two different types of leavinggroups, for example a halogen and a sulfonate or two different halogens,such as a bromide and a chloride. U.S. Pat. No. 6,197,760 to Struckteaches methods for making such mixed leaving group compounds.

“Neoplasia” refers to the process of abnormal and uncontrolled cellgrowth. Neoplasia is one example of a proliferative disorder. Theproduct of neoplasia is a neoplasm (a tumor), which is an abnormalgrowth of tissue that results from excessive cell division. A tumor thatdoes not metastasize is referred to as “benign.” A tumor that invadesthe surrounding tissue and/or can metastasize is referred to as“malignant.”

“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described eventor circumstance can but need not occur, and that the descriptionincludes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instanceswhere it does not.

As used herein, the term stable means that the compound does not degrademore than 5%, preferably not more than 2% or even 1% over at least fivedays, or the period of time specified. Such degradation can be monitoredby ¹H NMR, HPLC, or other suitable means.

As used herein, and as well understood in the art, “treatment” is anapproach for obtaining beneficial or desired results, including clinicalresults. Beneficial or desired clinical results can include, but are notlimited to, alleviation or amelioration of one or more symptoms orconditions, diminishment of extent of disease, stabilized (i.e. notworsening) state of disease, preventing spread of disease, delay orslowing of disease progression, amelioration or palliation of thedisease state, and remission (whether partial or total), whetherdetectable or undetectable. “Treatment” can also mean prolongingsurvival as compared to expected survival if not receiving treatment.

IV. Examples

The foregoing disclosure is further explained by the followingnon-limiting examples.

Example 1

A reactor was charged with Tris (103.3 mg) and MeCN (3 mL) followed byaddition of IPM (200.5 mg) in MeCN (3 mL). The reaction mixture wasstirred overnight. The solid was then collected by filtration and thecake was washed with MeCN. The cake was dried under vacuum to constantweight to provide the final product (296 mg). The final product wassubjected to X-ray powder diffraction to confirm crystallinity (FIG. 2).The crystallinity was further supported by DSC where a sharp peakappeared at 105.77 (FIG. 3). Additionally, the IPM•Tris salt showed aweight loss of 0.7692% around 125° C. by TGA (FIG. 4). Finally, SEMshowed that IPM•Tris had a plate-like crystal shape.

The stability of the crystalline IPM•Tris was monitored by ¹H NMR andwas found to remain stable at room temperature for up to six days. Thestability of the crystal structure was monitored by DSC which indicatedthat the IPM•Tris crystals had not absorbed water or changed instructure over the course of ten days at room temperature.

Example 2

A reactor was charged with Tris (8.563 g) and DMF (40 mL) and heated toform a clear solution. After the solution had cooled to roomtemperature, IPM was added. The mixture was stirred to form a clearsolution. Acetonitrile (40 mL) and a small amount of seeds were thenadded to the solution, followed by the slow addition of MTBE (240 mL) togive a slurry. The slurry was stirred for another hour at which time theprecipitate was collected by filtration, and the filter cake was washedwith MTBE (80 mL). The filter cake was dried under vacuum to constantweight at room temperature to provide the final product (23.2 g).

Example 3

30 to 40 mg fragments of MX-1 human mammary tumors from an in vivopassage were implanted subcutaneously in nu/nu mice in the mammary fatpad and allowed to reach 75-200 mg in weight before the start oftreatment. Treatment was initiated on Day 10 following tumorimplantation; administration was intraperitoneal once daily for 5 days.IPM•(LYS)₂ (43% IPM and 57% Lys) and IPM•Tris showed similar activityagainst MX-1 tumors when doses were normalized to IPM (see FIG. 6).

Example 4

30 to 40 mg fragments of MX-1 human mammary tumors from an in vivopassage were implanted sc in nu/nu mice in the mammary fat pad andallowed to reach 75-200 mg in weight before the start of treatment.Treatment was initiated on Day 10 following tumor implantation;administration was intraperitoneal or orally once daily for 5 days.IPM•Tris, which may be prepared as described in Example 1, at maximumtolerated doses for each administration, was equally active against MX-1tumors when administered orally or systemically (see FIG. 7).

Example 5 Cell Proliferation Assay

Growth inhibition was determined by the microculture tetrazolium method.Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well flat-bottomed microtitre plates ata density of 500 cells/well in 100 μL of media. After overnightincubation, 100 μL of media containing IPM•(LYS)₂ was added to achievespecified final concentrations and a final volume of 200 μL/well. Datapoints represent the mean viability and the error bars (standarddeviation of each experiment done in triplicate). At 120 hours therelative metabolic activities of treated and untreated cells weremeasured by mitochondrial conversion of3-[4,5-dimethylthiazon-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT,Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) to formazine. At the completion of the drugtreatment, 250 μg of MTT was added to each well and incubated at 37° C.,5% CO₂ for 6 hours. Formazine crystals were dissolved in DMSO andoptical density at 595 nm measured on a VERSAmax spectrophotometer(Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Viability was defined as theabsorbance at 595 nm in the treated samples divided by the absorbance at570 nm in the control samples. The IC₅₀ was defined as the concentrationat which viability of the treated cells was 50% that of the controls(treated/control=0.5).

Murine Xenograft Models

CB17 female scid*/* mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, N.Y.) wereimplanted with tumor subcutaneous flank tumors. The OS31 tumor line wasestablished at St. Judes Children's Cancer Research Hospital and hasbeen described previously (20). For transplantation with OS 1 tumor,mice were anesthetized with 4% isoflurane. After a small incision wasmade in the flank of the mouse, and a 4 mm by 4 mm section of tumorimplanted subcutaneously.

CB 17 female scid*/* mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, N.Y.) were treatedwith IPM•(LYS)₂ daily for 1 or 3 days via tailvein injection starting onday 1 every 21 days for 2 cycles. Five non-tumor-bearing mice wereassigned to each treatment group. Mice were treated with either 75mg/kg/day, 100 mg/kg/day, 150 mg/kg/day, or 200 mg/kg/day of IPM•(LYS)₂.A toxic event was defined as weight loss greater than or equal to 20%the animal's weight at the time of randomization, or death. The MTD isdefined as the highest dose at which no toxicity occurred.

When the tumors were approximately 0.20 to 0.7 cm in diameter,tumor-bearing mice were randomized into groups of 5 to 8 mice with 1treatment group and 1 control group. Treated mice received tasidotin ata dose of 90 mg/kg/day as an intraperitoneal injection daily for 5 daysstarting on days 1 and 21. Assuming a spherical tumor, the volume wasdetermined by the formula: mm³=*/6(D)d², where D is the maximal diameterand d is the diameter perpendicular to D. Volumes are expressed asrelative tumor volumes (RTV) where the tumor volume at any given timepoint is divided by the starting tumor volume. The RTV for treated andcontrol mice were measured a minimum of once per week.

Assessment of Tumor Response and Statistical Considerations in Mice

Using criteria defined previously by Houghton, et al. progressivedisease is defined as less than 50% regression from original tumorvolume for the entire study period (RTV>0.5) and greater than 25%increase in tumor volume at the end of the study period (RTV>1.25).Stable disease tumor regression that does not exceed 50% of the originaltumor volume throughout the entire study period (RTV>0.5) and less than25% increase in tumor volume at the end of the study period (RTV<1.25).A partial response is defined as greater than 50% regression in tumorvolume (RTV<0.5) but with a measurable tumor mass of greater than 0.10cm³. Loss of measurable tumor mass (<0.10 cm³) at any point during thetreatment period (6 weeks) was defined as a complete response (CR). Asustained CR was defined as a loss of measurable tumor mass (<0.10 cm³)at any point after initiation of therapy without re-growth during the 6week study period. Mice that died before week 9 or before the tumorreached 4 times the initial volume were excluded.

Statistical analysis was based on event-free survival (EFS). An event isdefined as a relative tumor volume of 4× (i.e., quadruple the startingtumor size), or death, EFS is defined as the time from the initiation ofthe study to an event. For those tumors not reaching an event by 6weeks, the end of the study period, the EFS time was excluded at thattime. The exact log-rank test was used to compare event-free survivaldistributions between treatment and control groups. Additionally, theday 22 RTVs for the control and treated mice were compared using theWilcoxian-Mann-Whitney test. This allows for comparison of tumor volumeafter one cycle of tasidotin and at or near the time of event for theuntreated mice.

Biological Data

The tumor cell lines used included RD and RH30 rhabdomyosarcoma lines(American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.), Saos-2 osteosarcomaline, SKPNDW and SKES1 Ewing's sarcoma lines, and HSSYII and SYOIsynovial sarcoma lines. The cells were grown in monolayer at 37° C., 5%CO₂ in media of MEM (Saos-2, SYO-1, HSSY-II), DME (SK-PN-DW, RD), orRPMI (RH30) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen,Carlsbad, Calif.), 0.5% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,Calif.), and 1% glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). The resultsare shown below (FIGS. 8 and 9).

Cell Line Histology Daily × 3 IC₅₀ Daily × 1 IC₅₀ SK-PN-DW Ewing'sSarcoma ≦0.5 μg/mL ≦5.0 μg/mL SK-ES-1 Ewing's Sarcoma ≦0.5 μg/mL ≦5.0μg/mL RH30 Alveolar ≦1.0 μg/mL ≦1.0 μg/mL Rhabdomyosarcoma RD Embryonal≦5.0 μg/mL ≦1.0 μg/mL Rhabdomyosarcoma SYO-1 Synovial Sarcoma ≦1.0 μg/mL≦1.0 μg/mL HSSY-II Synovial Sarcoma ≦0.5 μg/mL ≦0.5 μg/mL SaOSOsteosarcoma ≦5.0 μg/mL ≦5.0 μg/mL OS222 Osteosarcoma ≦5.0 μg/mL ≦10.0μg/mL  OS229 Osteosarcoma ≦0.5 μg/mL ≦0.5 μg/mL OS230 Osteosarcoma ≦5.0μg/mL ≦5.0 μg/mL

Resistance to cyclophosphamide (CPA) and ifosfamide (IFOS) is a majorobstacle to overcome in cancer treatment. Mice with xenografts ofCPA-resistant human sarcoma cells had a more than 5-fold reduction insarcoma growth when treated with IPM•(LYS)₂; CPA therapy had no effect(FIGS. 10 to 12).

Human Clinical Trials

The safety and dose-ranging phase I studies utilized IPM•(LYS)₂administered daily for three consecutive days each four weeks (1 cycle).The results demonstrated evidence of clinical activity in sarcoma (2/11subjects including at least one who had failed IFOS therapy) andmesothelioma (1 subject with extended stable disease). The maximumtolerated dose (MTD) of IPM•(LYS)₂ on this schedule was 400 mg/m²/d.There was little bone marrow toxicity and no hemorrhagic cystitis(bladder toxicity) or CNS toxicity. The dose limiting toxicity wascharacterized by electrolyte imbalances. This MTD is comparable to IFOSdoses of greater than 25 g/m² and this dose achieves serum levels thatare 25-fold higher than doses that kill 50% of human sarcoma cell lines.

Example 6 Materials and Methods

Animal Care: Five-to-six weeks-old male CD2F1 mice were purchased fromFrederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, Md.).

Tumor Model: Mice were implanted ip with one million cells of the P388murine leukemia using a 23-gauge needle. The P388 tumor line wasmaintained as an in vivo passage. The day of tumor implantation wasdesignated as day 0, with treatment beginning on day 1 following tumorimplantation. A sufficient number of mice were implanted so that animalswith body weights in a range as narrow as possible were selected for thetrial.

Drug Formulation: IPM•(LYS)₂, supplied in pre-weighed vials of 100 mg,was formulated in saline on the first day of treatment (day 1) at aconcentration of 70 mg/mL. A portion of this solution was then dilutedto the lower dosing concentrations of 46.65, 23.35, 14, 9.35, 4.65, and2.8 mg/mL. On subsequent days of treatment, IPM•(LYS)₂ was formulated at14 mg/mL and a portion of that solution was then diluted to the lowerdosing concentrations. All injections were administered on the basis ofexact body weight with the injection volume being 0.2 mL/10 g bodyweight.

Drug Treatment: The study consisted of eight treatment groups of eightmice per group and two vehicle-treated control groups with ten mice fora total of 84 mice on the first day of treatment. IPM•(LYS)₂ wasadministered as a single injection on day 1 (q1d×1) at dosages of 1400,933, and 467 mg/kg given po and at a dosage of 280 mg/kg given ip.IPM•(LYS)₂ was also administered daily for five consecutive days (q1d×5)at dosages of 280, 187, and 93 mg/kg/dose given po and at a dosage of 56mg/kg/dose given ip. One control group was treated with salineadministered po as a single injection on day 1. The second control groupwas treated with saline administered po on a q1d×5 treatment schedule.

Study Duration: The study was terminated 61 days after tumorimplantation. Any animal that became moribund was euthanized prior tostudy termination.

Parameters Evaluated: Number of nonspecific deaths, median days ofdeath, and the increase in lifespan based on the median day of death andexpressed as a percentage (% ILS); median survival time and the % ILScalculated based on the median survival time.

Statistical Analysis: The individual animals' survival time was used asthe endpoint in a life tables analysis (stratified Kaplan-Meierestimation followed by the Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test) in order tostatistically compare the survival data between groups. A life tablesanalysis allows one to compare the survival data between the groupsusing the animals that did not reach the endpoint by excluding them.

Results

The median day of death in both of the vehicle-treated control groupswas 11.0, with deaths occurring between days 10 and 14. Ascites waspresent in all animals.

IPM•(LYS)₂, administered po as a single treatment given on day 1, wastoxic to the mice at dosages of 1400 and 933 mg/kg. In the groupreceiving treatment with the dosage of 1400 mg/kg, one animal died andfour animals were euthanized due to moribundity on day 5, two animalswere euthanized on day 6, and the last animal died on day 10. In thegroup receiving treatment with the dosage of 933 mg/kg, six animals wereeuthanized on day 5 due to moribundity and the remaining two animals inthe group died on day 9. Necropsy indicated no presence of tumor inthese two treatment groups. Prior to death or euthanasia of the animals,significant weight losses of 24% and 22% were observed in groupsreceiving IPM•(LYS)₂ at dosages of 1400 and 933 mg/kg, respectively.IPM•(LYS)₂ administered at a dosage of 467 mg/kg as a single potreatment was better tolerated; however, two animals were euthanized onday 8 due to moribundity. The maximum loss in average body weight forthis group was 8%. The remaining six animals in the group died betweendays 11 and 15 and were determined to have ascites present uponnecropsy. The ILS for this treatment group was 9% whether thecalculation was based on median day of death or median survival time.Statistical comparison of the survival data for this group with that ofthe vehicle-treated control group (group 1, treated q1d×1) indicatedthat the difference was not significant.

IPM•(LYS)₂, administered ip at a dosage of 280 mg/kg as a singleinjection was tolerated without deaths and with a minimal loss in meanbody weight (4%, 1 g). The median day of death for this group was 34.5with an ILS of 214%. The median survival time was 38.0 days with an ILSof 245%. Additionally, two animals survived until study termination onday 61. Necropsy indicated no tumor present. Statistical analysis of thesurvival data for this treatment group and the vehicle-treated controlgroup (group 1, treated q1d×1) indicated the difference was significant.

IPM•(LYS)₂, administered po at dosages of 280, 187, and 93 mg/kg/dose ona q1d×5 treatment schedule, was tolerated without treatment-relateddeaths. A minimal loss in mean body weight (4%, 1 g) was observed in thegroup receiving IPM•(LYS)₂ at a dosage of 280 mg/kg/dose. No weight losswas observed for the two lower dosage groups. Median days of death andmedian survival times were 17.0, 17.0, and 15.0 days with ILS values of55%, 55%, and 36% for the dosages of 280, 187, and 93 mg/kg/dose,respectively. Statistical comparison of the survival data for each ofthese three groups with survival data for the vehicle-treated control(group 6, treated q1d×5) indicated the increase in lifespan for eachgroup was statistically significant.

IPM•LYS)₂, given ip at a dosage of 56 mg/kg/dose on a q1d×5 injectionschedule, was quite effective against the P388/0 leukemia with a medianday of death of 28.5 The first death occurred on day 24 and the lastdeath on day 33, with four of the eight animals in the group survivinguntil the time of the study termination on day 61. The ILS valuecalculated based on median day of death was 159%. The median survivaltime for this treatment group was >47.0 days with a calculated ILS valueof 327%. This treatment regimen was well-tolerated with notreatment-related deaths and a 4% (1 g) loss in mean body weight. Whenthe survival data for this group was statistically compared to that ofthe vehicle-treated control group (group 6, treated q1d×5) thedifference was found to be significant.

Summary of Statistical Analysis Group Pairs p value 1 vs. 4 0.192 1 vs.5 0.000 4. vs. 5  0.000 6 vs. 7 0.000 6 vs. 8 0.000 6 vs. 9 0.000  6 vs.10 0.000  7 vs. 10 0.000

Conclusions

IPM•(LYS)₂ was toxic to the mice when administered po as a singletreatment at dosages of 1400 and 933 mg/kg. A single treatment with thedosage of 467 mg/kg administered po was tolerated but elicited only aminimal increase in lifespan that was not statistically significant.IPM•(LYS)₂, administered as a single ip injection at a dosage of 280mg/kg, was quite effective and resulted in two 61-day survivors and asignificant increase in lifespan.

IPM•(LYS)₂, administered po on a q1d×5 schedule at dosages of 280, 187,and 93, was much better tolerated and more effective against the P388/0leukemia than the single treatments with higher dosages. Treatment withall three dosages given po q1d×5 produced statistically significantincreases in lifespan. When administered ip on a q1d×5 treatmentschedule at a dosage of 56 mg/kg/dose, IPM•(LYS)₂ elicited significantincreases in lifespan with four of eight animals in the group survivinguntil study termination on day 61.

Example 7 Materials and Methods

Animal Care: Five-weeks-old female athymic NCr-nu/nu mice were purchasedfrom Taconic Farms (Germantown, N.Y.).

Tumor Model: 30 to 40 mg fragments of MX-1 human mammary tumorsmaintained in an in vivo passage were implanted sc in mice in themammary fat pad using a 12-gauge trocar needle and allowed to grow. Theday of tumor implantation was designated as day 0. Tumors were allowedto reach 138-245 mg in weight (138-245 mm³ in size) before the start oftreatment. A sufficient number of mice were implanted so that tumors ina weight range as narrow as possible were selected for the trial on theday of treatment initiation (day 10 after tumor implantation). Thoseanimals selected with tumors in the proper size range were assigned tothe various treatment groups so that the median tumor weights on thefirst day of treatment were as close to each other as possible (172-197mg).

Drug Formulation: IPM•Tris (205 mg of IPM/vial) which may be prepared asdescribed in Example 1, and IPM were both formulated in saline on thefirst day of treatment (day 10) at a concentration of 6.0 mg/mL and thendiluted with saline to the lower dosing concentrations of 4.05, 1.8, and1.2 mg/mL. IPM•(LYS)₂ (100 mg IPM-Lysine/vial) was formulated in salineon the first day of treatment at a concentration of 14 mg/mL and thendiluted with saline to the lower dosing concentrations of 9.35, 4.2 and2.8 mg/mL. Each concentration was then aliquoted for daily use, frozen,stored at −20° C., and thawed for daily use. All injections wereadministered on the basis of exact body weight with the injection volumebeing 0.2 mL/10 g body weight.

Drug Treatment: The experiment consisted of 12 treatment groups of eightmice per group and two vehicle-treated control groups with ten mice eachfor a total of 116 mice on the first day of treatment. All agents (andvehicle) were administered daily for five consecutive days (q1d×5).IPM•Tris and IPM were both administered ip at dosages of 36 and 24mg/kg/dose and po at dosages of 120 and 81 mg/kg/dose. IPM•(LYS)₂ wasadministered ip at dosages of 84 and 56 mg/kg/dose and po at dosages of280 and 187 mg/kg/dose. The control groups were treated either ip or powith the vehicle (saline).

Tumor Measurements and Body Weights: The sc tumors were measured and theanimals were weighed twice weekly starting with the first day oftreatment. Tumor volume was determined by caliper measurements (mm) andusing the formula for an ellipsoid sphere:

L×W ²/2=mm³,

where L and W refer to the larger and smaller perpendicular dimensionscollected at each measurement. This formula is also used to calculatetumor weight, assuming unit density (1 mm³=1 mg).

Study Duration: The study was terminated 50 days after tumorimplantation. Any animal that became moribund or whose tumor becameulcerated or reached 4,000 mg was euthanized prior to study termination.

Parameters Evaluated: Number of nonspecific deaths, number of partialand complete tumor regressions, number of tumor-free survivors, and theindividual animals' times to reach two tumor mass doublings weredetermined. The median time to reach two tumor mass doublings in thetreatment groups (T) and control group (C) was used in the calculationof the overall delay in the growth of the median tumor (T-C).

Statistical Analysis: The individual animal's time to reach two tumormass doublings was used as the endpoint in a Student's t-test/MannWhitney rank sum test or life tables analysis in order to comparestatistically the growth data between groups. A life tables analysis(stratified Kaplan-Meier estimation followed by the Mantel-Haenszellog-rank test) allows one to compare the growth data between groupsusing the animals whose tumors did not reach the evaluation point byexcluding them.

Results

Tumors in both vehicle-treated control groups grew well in all 10 mice.The median tumor reached two tumor mass doublings in 7.4 and 7.2 days,respectively, for the ip-treated and po-treated groups. There was noloss in mean body weight for these two groups during the study.

Intraperitoneal administration of IPM•Tris at dosages of 36 and 24mg/kg/dose elicited tumor growth delays (T-C) of 10.2 and 7.7 days,respectively. The higher dosage had one tumor-free survivor. Bothdosages were tolerated with maximum losses in mean body weight of 10% (2g) and 0% for dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/dose, respectively.Intraperitoneal administration of IPM at dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/doseelicited tumor growth delays of 5.2 and 2.6 days, respectively. Bothdosages were tolerated with maximum losses in mean body weight of 0% and5% (1 g) for dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/dose, respectively. The times toreach two tumor mass doublings for IPM were statistically less than thatfor the corresponding dosage of IPM•Tris (p 0.000 for the dosage of 36mg/kg/dose; p=0.021 for the dosage of 24 mg/kg/dose). Intraperitonealadministration of IPM•(LYS)₂ at dosages of 84 and 56 mg/kg/dose, whichcorrespond to IPM dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/dose, elicited tumor growthdelays of 24.3 and 9.0 days, respectively. The higher dosage ofIPM•(LYS)₂ was toxic—two mice dead on day 20 and two euthanized becauseof morbundity or excessive loss in body weight. The lower dosage ofIPM•(LYS)₂ was tolerated with a maximum loss in mean body weight of 15%(3 g). The tolerated IPM•(LYS)₂ dosage exhibited comparable activity tothat for IPM•Tris at a corresponding dosage of 24 mg/kg/dose (p=0.766)and superior activity to that for IPM at a corresponding dosage of 24mg/kg/dose (p=0.0047).

Oral administration of IPM•Tris at dosages of 120 and 81 mg/kg/doseelicited tumor growth delays of 8.7 and 9.0 days, respectively. Thehigher dosage of IPM•Tris elicited a maximum loss in mean body weight of15% (3 g) with one mouse being euthanized because of a body weight lessthan 14 g. The lower dosage was tolerated with a maximum loss in meanbody weight of 10% (2 g). Oral administration of IPM at dosages of 120and 81 mg/kg/dose elicited tumor growth delays of 4.6 and 4.0 days,respectively. Both dosages were tolerated with a maximum loss in meanbody weight of 5% (1 g). The times to reach two tumor mass doublingswere not statistically different from the times for the correspondingdosage of IPM•Tris (p=0.1174 for the dosage of 120 mg/kg/dose; p=0.1152for the dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose). Oral administration of IPM•(LYS)₂ atdosages of 280 and 187 mg/kg/dose, which correspond to IPM dosages of120 and 81 mg/kg/dose, elicited tumor growth delays of 5.0 and 3.5 days,respectively. Both dosages were tolerated with maximum losses in meanbody weight of 5% (1 g) and 0%. The higher dosage of IPM•(LYS)₂exhibited comparable activity to that for both IPM•Tris and IPM at acorresponding dosage of 120 mg/kg/dose (p=0.1000 and p=0.9143,respectively). The lower dosage of IPM•(LYS)₂ exhibited inferioractivity to that for IPM•Tris at a corresponding dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose(p=0.0290) and comparable activity to that for IPM at a correspondingdosage of 81 mg/kg/dose (p=0.3073).

Summary of Table of Statistical Analysis Group Pairs p Value 2 vs 40.000¹ 3 vs 5 0.021¹ 3 vs 7 0.766¹ 5 vs 7 0.0047²  9 vs 11 0.1174³  9 vs13 0.1000³ 11 vs 13 0.9143³ 10 vs 12 0.1152³ 10 vs 14 0.0290³ 12 vs 140.3073³ ¹Life tables analysis ²Mann-Whitney rank sum test ³Student'st-test

The response of the MX-1 human mammary tumor xenografts to treatmentwith (1) vehicle—ip and po, (2) ip IPM•Tris, IPM, and IPM•(LYS)₂, and(3) po IPM•Tris, IPM, and IPM•(LYS)₂ is shown in FIGS. 13, 14, and 15,respectively.

Conclusion

For ip administration of equivalent IPM dosages the antitumor activityof IPM•Tris was superior to that for IPM (both dosages) and comparableto that for IPM•(LYS)₂ (both dosages). For po administration ofequivalent IPM dosages, the antitumor activity of IPM•Tris wascomparable to that for IPM (both dosages), comparable to that forIPM•(LYS)₂ at the higher dosage, and superior to that for IPM•(LYS)₂ atthe lower dosage.

Example 8 Materials and Methods

Animal Care: Five-weeks-old female athymic NCr-nu/nu mice were purchasedfrom Harlan (Prattville, Ala.).

Tumor Model: Thirty-to-forty mg fragments of MX-1 human mammary tumormaintained in an in vivo passage were implanted sc in mice in themammary fat pad using a 12-gauge trocar needle and allowed to grow. Theday of tumor implantation was designated as day 0. Tumors were allowedto reach 113-245 mg in weight (113-245 mm³ in size) before the start oftreatment. A sufficient number of mice were implanted so that tumors ina weight range as narrow as possible were selected for the trial on theday of treatment initiation (day 6 after tumor implantation). Thoseanimals selected with tumors in the proper size range were assigned tothe various treatment groups so that the median tumor weights on thefirst day of treatment were as close to each other as possible (144-162mg).

Drug Formulation: IPM•Tris (205 mg of IPM/vial, Cardinal Health) whichmay be prepared as described in Example 1, was formulated in saline oneach day of treatment at a concentration of 13.5 mg/mL and then dilutedwith saline to the lower dosing concentrations of 9, 6, 4.05, 2.7, 1.8,and 1.2 mg/mL. IPM (Eagle-Picher Pharmaceutical Service) was formulatedin saline on each day of treatment at a concentration of 6.0 mg/mL andthen diluted with saline to the lower dosing concentrations of 4.05,1.8, and 1.2 mg/mL. IPM•(LYS)₂ (100 mg IPM-Lysine/vial, University ofIowa) was formulated in saline on the each day of treatment at aconcentration of 14 mg/mL and then diluted with saline to the lowerdosing concentrations of 9.35, 4.2, and 2.8 mg/mL. All dosing solutionswere kept on ice after formulation and were administered within 30 min.All injections were administered on the basis of exact body weight withthe injection volume being 0.2 mL/10 g body weight.

Drug Treatment: The experiment consisted of 16 treatment groups of eightmice per group and two vehicle-treated control groups with ten mice eachfor a total of 148 mice on the first day of treatment. All agents (andvehicle) were administered daily for five consecutive days (q1d×5).IPM•Tris was administered ip at dosages of 81, 54, 36, and 24 mg/kg/doseand po at dosages of 270, 180, 120 and 81 mg/kg/dose. IPM wasadministered ip at dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/dose and po at dosages of120 and 81 mg/kg/dose. IPM•(LYS)₂ was administered ip at dosages of 84and 56 mg/kg/dose and po at dosages of 280 and 187 mg/kg/dose. Thecontrol groups were treated either ip (group no. 1) or po (group no. 10)with the vehicle (saline).

Tumor Measurements and Body Weights: The sc tumors were measured and theanimals were weighed twice weekly starting with the first day oftreatment. Tumor volume was determined by caliper measurements (mm) andusing the formula for an ellipsoid sphere:

L×W ²/2=mm³,

where L and W refer to the larger and smaller perpendicular dimensionscollected at each measurement. This formula is also used to calculatetumor weight, assuming unit density (1 mm³=1 mg.).

Study Duration: The study was terminated 52 days after tumorimplantation. Any animal that became moribund or whose tumor becameulcerated and reached 4,000 mg was euthanized prior to studytermination.

Parameters Evaluated: Number of nonspecific deaths, number of partialand complete tumor regressions, number of tumor-free survivors, and theindividual animals' times to reach two tumor mass doublings weredetermined. The median time to reach two tumor mass doubling in thetreatment groups (T) and control group (C) was used in the calculationof the overall delay in the growth of the median tumor (T-C).

Statistical Analysis: The individual animal's time to reach two tumormass doublings was used as the endpoint in a Student's t-test/MannWhitney rank sum test in order to compare statistically the growth databetween groups.

Results

Tumors in both vehicle-treated control groups grew well in all 10 mice.The median tumor reached two tumor mass doublings in 9.2 and 8.9 days,respectively, for the ip-treated and po-treated groups. There was noloss in mean body weight for these two groups during the study.

Intraperitoneal administration of IPM•Tris at a dosage of 81 mg/kg/dosewas toxic to the mice, eliciting three deaths and one euthanasia due tomorbundity and a maximum loss in mean body weight of 20% (4.5 g). Thelower dosages of 54, 36, and 24 mg/kg/dose were tolerated with maximumlosses in mean body weight of 5% (1.2 g), 6% (1.3 g), and 1% (0.2 g),respectively. The dosages of 54, 35, and 24 mg/kg/dose elicited tumorgrowth delays (T-C) of 4.4, 3.3, and 0.9 days, respectively.Intraperitoneal administration of IPM at dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/doseelicited tumor growth delays of 1.1 and 0.3 days, respectively. Bothdosages were tolerated with maximum losses in mean body weight of 8%(1.8 g) and 2% (0.4 g) for dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/dose,respectively. The times to reach two tumor mass doublings for IPM werestatistically less than that for the highest tolerated dosages ofIPM•Tris but statistically the same as the corresponding dosage ofIPM•Tris (p=0.0148 for the dosage of 54 mg/kg/dose; p=0.1879 for thedosage of 36 mg/kg/dose). Intraperitoneal administration of IPM•(LYS)₂at dosages of 84 and 56 mg/kg/dose, which correspond to IPM dosages of36 and 24 mg/kg/dose, elicited tumor growth delays of 0.5 and 0.3 day,respectively. Both dosages were tolerated with maximum losses in meanbody weight of 1% (0.3 g) and 0% for dosages of 36 and 24 mg/kg/dose,respectively. The times to reach two tumor mass doublings for IPM•(LYS)₂were statistically less than that for the highest tolerated dosage ofIPM•Tris but statistically the same as the corresponding dosage ofIPM•Tris (p=0.0104 for the dosage of 54 mg/kg/dose; p=0.1578 for thedosage of 36 mg/kg/dose).

Oral administration of IPM•Tris at dosages of 270, 180, and 120mg/kg/dose was toxic to the mice, eliciting eight deaths/euthanasia dueto morbundity, seven deaths, and three deaths, respectively. The dosagesof 180 and 120 mg/kg/dose elicited maximum losses in mean body weight of23% (5.3 g) and 20% (4.7 g), respectively. The lowest dosage of 81mg/kg/dose was tolerated with a maximum loss in mean body weight of 10%(2.2 g). The dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose elicited a tumor growth delay of2.6 days. Oral administration of IPM at a dosage of 120 mg/kg/dose wastoxic to the mice, eliciting two deaths and a maximum loss in mean bodyweight of 18% (3.8 g). The lower dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose was toleratedwith a maximum loss in mean body weight of 9% (2 g) and elicited a tumorgrowth delay of 2.3 days. The times to reach two tumor mass doublingswere not statistically different from the times for the correspondingdosage of IPM•Tris (p=0.2932 for the dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose). Oraladministration of IPM•(LYS)₂ at dosages of 280 and 187 mg/kg/dose, whichcorrespond to IPM dosages of 120 and 81 mg/kg/dose, elicited tumorgrowth delays of 3.9 and 4.7 days, respectively. Both dosages weretolerated with maximum losses in mean body weight of 14% (3 g) and 7%(1.6 g). The lower dosage of IPM•(LYS)₂ exhibited similar activity tothat for IPM•Tris at a corresponding dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose (p=0.8785).

Summary Table of Statistical Analysis Group Pairs p Value 1 vs. 30.00101 1 vs. 6 0.02302 1 vs. 8 0.1456² 3 vs. 6 0.0148¹ 3 vs. 8 0.0104¹4. vs. 6  0.1879² 4 vs. 8 0.1578² 10 vs. 14 0.0053² 10 vs. 16 0.0234¹ 10vs. 17 0.0039¹ 14 vs. 16 0.2932² 14 vs. 17 0.7209¹ 14 vs. 18 0.8785¹¹Mann-Whitney rank sum test ²Student's t-test

The response of the MX-1 human mammary tumor xenografts to treatmentwith (1) vehicle—ip and po, (2) ip IPM•Tris, IPM, and IPM•(LYS)₂, and(3) po IPM•Tris, IPM, and IPM•(LYS)₂ is shown in FIGS. 16, 17, and 18,respectively.

Conclusions

For ip administration of equivalent IPM dosages the antitumor activityof IPM•Tris was comparable to that for both IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂ (higherdosage). The lower dosage was inactive against the MX-1 tumor in thisstudy. The highest tolerated dosage of IPM•Tris was superior to thehighest tested dosage of either IPM or IPM•(LYS)₂. For po administrationof equivalent IPM dosages, the antitumor activity of the IPM•Tris wascomparable to that for both IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂ at the lower dosage. Thedosage of 120 mg/kg/dose was toxic to the mice for both IPM•Tris andIPM.

In the previous MX-1 study (Example 7) for ip administration ofequivalent IPM dosages the antitumor activity of IPM•Tris was superiorto that for IPM (both dosages) and comparable to that for IPM•(LYS)₂(both dosages). For po administration of equivalent IPM dosages, theantitumor activity of IPM•Tris was comparable to that for IPM (bothdosages), comparable to that for IPM•(LYS)₂ at the higher dosage, andsuperior to that for IPM•(LYS)₂ at the lower dosage.

In comparing the two studies the activity of the three agents whenadministered ip was less in this study (e.g., for IPM•Tris at a dosageof 36 mg/kg/dose—T-C value of 10.2 days vs. 3.3 days; for IPM at adosage of 36 mg/kg/dose—T-C value of 5/2 days vs. 1.1 days; and forIPM•(LYS)₂ at a dosage of 56 mg/kg/dose—T-C value of 9.0 days vs. 0.3day). The activity of IPM•Tris when administered po was also less(comparable values for IPM and IPM•(LYS)₂) in this study (e.g. forIPM•Tris at a dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose—T-C value of 9.0 days vs. 2.6days; for IPM at a dosage of 81 mg/kg/dose—T-C value of 4.0 days vs. 2.3days; and for IPM•(LYS)₂ at a dosage of 280 mg/kg/dose—T-C value of 5.0days vs. 3.9 days). The reason(s) for the decreased activity is notobvious, given the study-to-study variation with such biologicalsystems. With respect to the tumor component of the study, thevehicle-treated control tumors grew at comparable rates in the twostudies. The median tumor weights on the first day of treatment wereslightly larger in Example 7 (range of 172-197 mg) than in this example(range of 144-162 mg); however, this small difference should have nosignificant effect on the antitumor activity.

Example 9 Materials and Methods

Three groups of eight mice were treated with IPM•Tris, which may beprepared as described in Example 1, three groups of eight mice weretreated with doxorubicin, one group of ten mice was treated withvehicle, and eighteen groups of eight mice were treated with theIPM•Tris/doxorubicin combination. MX-1 tumor fragments (30-40 mg, froman in vivo passage) were implanted subcutaneously in the mammary fat padin female athymic nude mice. IPM•Tris (or its vehicle) was givenintraperitoneally daily for five consecutive days (Q1d×5) at threedosages (12, 24, and 54 mg/kg/dose), wherein the IPM•Tris formulationcomprised 258.9 mg IPM (MW 221.02), 141.9 mg Tris base (MW 121.14, molarratio IPM:Tris base 1:1), and 3% Mannitol. Doxorubicin (or its vehicle)was given intravenously every fourth day for three injections (Q4d×3) at8 mg/kg/dose). Dosing solutions were prepared on the day of treatmentand IPM•Tris dosing solutions were kept on ice once prepared.

Treatment began when tumors were approximately 175 mg in size (range of100 to 250 mg). Each tumor was measured by caliper in two dimensions andconverted to tumor mass using the formula for a prolate ellipsoid(a×b²/2), where a is the longer dimension and b is the smallerdimension, assuming unit density (1 mm³=1 mg). Tumor measurements wererecorded twice weekly and antitumor activity was assessed by the delayin tumor growth of the treated groups in comparison to thevehicle-treated control group, partial and complete regressions, andtumor-free survivors. Note that when IPM•Tris was administered at 54mg/kg/day in combination with doxorubicin at 8 mg/kg/day, two animals inthe combination group died early due to toxicity. Results can be seen inFIGS. 19-25.

The combination of IPM•Tris with doxorubicin resulted in significantantitumor activity, where tumor growth inhibition by the combinationexceeded that observed with single agent administration and thecombination significantly increased survival in comparison to singleagent administration. In fact, the effect of the combination showssynergistic efficacy, that is, greater than additive efficacy comparedto the agents administered individually in like doses, even where thedosage of IPM•Tris alone is so low as to provide little or noimprovement when compared to a vehicle-treated control animal. Whileanimal weights in the combination groups were reduced during treatment(average animal weights reduced by 20% at end of dosing at day 22), theyquickly recovered once dosing ended (full recovery was observed by day38), suggesting that toxicity was reversible. This data suggests thatcombination therapy with IPM•Tris and doxorubicin may be useful fortreating any cancer that responds to either doxorubicin or IPM•Tris assingle agents or in combination, including but not limited to, breastcancer, ovarian cancer, and sarcoma.

Example 10

Fragments (30 to 40 mg each) of MX-1 human mammary tumors from an invivo passage were implanted subcutaneously in nude mice in the mammaryfat pad and were allowed to reach 75 to 198 mg in weight beforeinitiation of treatment. IPM•Tris (54 mg/kg), which may be prepared asdescribed in Example 1, and docetaxel (10 mg/kg) were administered Q1D×5IP and Q6D×3 IV, respectively, starting ten days after tumorimplantation. The combination of the two agents demonstrated anincreased antitumor effect compared to either agent administered as asingle agent as seen in FIG. 26.

Example 11

Fragments (30 to 40 mg each) of MX-1 human mammary tumors from an invivo passage were implanted subcutaneously in nude mice in the mammaryfat pad and were allowed to reach 75 to 198 mg in weight before thestart of treatment. IPM•Tris (36 mg/kg), which may be prepared asdescribed in Example 1, administered IP was found to suppress tumorgrowth to approximately the same extent as IPM•Tris (81 mg/kg)administered PO as seen in FIG. 27. Additionally, the oral or systemicadministration of IPM•Tris resulted in similar increases in survival ofMX-1 xenograft-bearing mice. The median survival of the IP group was 39days, the median survival of the PO group was 37.5 days, and the mediansurvival of the vehicle control group was 30 days as seen in FIG. 28.The equivalent antitumor activity of these PO and IP doses is within therange expected from the PK of orally and systemically administeredIPM•Tris.

Example 12

Sprague-Dawley rats were administered IPM•Tris, which may be prepared asdescribed in Example 1, once daily via gavage (PO) or bolus IVinjection. IPM•Tris was administered in doses of 20, 30, or 40 mg/kg andblood samples for PK evaluation were obtained pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2,4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose from the retro orbital sinus. Threeanimals per group were sampled at each time point. PK results forpre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours are shown in FIG. 29 where T_(max)appeared to be approximately 0.5 hours. Estimates of terminal t_(1/2)ranged from 0.25 to 0.64 hours. For each dose, AUC values were used toestimate absolute bioequivalence of orally administered IPM•Tris as theratio (AUC post-PO dose)/(AUC post-IV dose). AUC values for each doseare shown in FIG. 30 and C_(max) values for each dose are shown in FIG.31. Both AUC and C_(max) values increased linearly with increasing doseof PO- or IV-administered IPM•Tris.

Bioavailability of the 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg PO doses of IPM•Tris were48%, 65%, and 73%, respectively. Overall mean bioavailability was 62% infemales. Similar PK was observed in rats; however, mean bioavailabilityin males was estimated to be 41%.

Example 13 Solution Stability of IPM•Tris/Mannitol and IPM•(LYS)₂

The reconstituted stability of IPM•Tris formulation was evaluated in 5%sodium chloride solution for injection. The concentration of IPM wasfound to maintain >90% potency for up to 2.0 hours.

The IPM•(LYS)₂ formulation was evaluated in 0.9% sodium chloridesolution for injection. The concentration of IPM was found tomaintain >90% potency for up to 1.0 hour.

Solution Stability of IPM•Tris/Mannitol

Table 1 presents reconstitution stability data for IPM•Tris/mannitol inthe presence of 25 mL of 5% sodium chloride solution for injection.Aliquots were taken at target times of ˜1 hr, 1.5 hrs, 2.5 hrs, 3.5 hrs,4.0 hrs, and 5.0 hrs. Samples were analyzed for IPM potency.

TABLE 1 Reconstitution Stability of IPM•Tris/Mannitol in the Presence of5% Sodium Chloride Solution Reconstitution % Potency based on OriginalTime (hours) IPM Vial Content 0 100 1 94 2 90 3 86 4 81 6 74

Solution Stability of IPM•(LYS)₂

Table 2 presents reconstitution stability data for IPM•(LYS)₂ in thepresence of 25 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution for injection.Aliquots were taken at target times of ˜1 hr, 2 hrs, 2.5 hrs, 3.5 hrs,4.0 hrs, and 5.0 hrs. Samples were analyzed for IPM•(LYS)₂ potency.

TABLE 2 Reconstitution Stability of IPM•(LYS)₂ in the Presence of 0.9%Sodium Chloride Solution Reconstitution % Potency based on Original Time(hours) IPM•(LYS)₂ Vial Content 0 100 1 90 2 79 2.5 71 3.5 64 4 57 5 51

Conclusion

IPM/tromethamine/mannitol formulation maintains 90% potency for 2.0hours when subjected to 5% sodium chloride in solution. IPM•(LYS)₂formulation maintains 90% potency for 1.0 hour in the presence of 0.9%sodium chloride. The difference in the reconstitution stability (>90%potency) between the two formulations is 1.0 hours, a factor of two. Theincrease in stability time may assist clinicians during preparation andadministration of drug product.

Example 14 Solution Stability of IPM

The reconstituted stability of IPM formulation was evaluated in pH 7buffer at approximately 25° C. over 3.5 hours as shown below in Table 3and in FIG. 32,

Reconstitution Time (hours) % Purity 0 100.00%  0.5 89.5% 1.0 80.3% 1.572.2% 2.0 64.8% 2.5 57.4% 3.0 52.1% 3.5 47.0%

Solution Stability of IPM•Tris/Mannitol

Table 4 presents reconstitution stability data for IPM•Tris/Mannitol inthe presence of 25 mL of 5% sodium chloride solution for injection.Aliquots were taken at target times of 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 hours.

Reconstitution Purity Time (hours) (%) 0 99.80 1.5 99.72 3.0 99.49 4.599.50

Solution Stability of IPM•(LYS)₂

Table 5 presents reconstitution stability data for IPM•(LYS)₂ in thepresence of 25 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution for injection.Aliquots were taken at target times of 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 hrs.

Reconstitution Purity Time (hours) (%) 0 97.48 1.5 96.97 3.0 92.54 4.5³95.37

Example 15

Stability of Solid IPM•Tris One month Two months Three months Purity (%area) −20° C. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%    5° C. 99.9% 100.0 100.0%   25° C.100.0% 99.8% 99.9% Potency (IPM −20° C. 100.5% 100.4% 102.4% content %w/w)    5° C. 101.3% 99.6% 102.3%   25° C. 97.8% 90.9% 80.8%

Stability of Solid IPM•Tris/Mannitol lyophilisate Time zero 1 month 3months 6 months 9 months Purity −70° C. 98.5% 98.7% 98.7% 99.7% 99.8% (%−20° C. 98.5% 98.6% 99.1% 99.3% 99.8% area)  5° C. 98.5% 99.1% 98.9%99.2% 99.8%

Stability of Solid IPM•(LYS)₂ lyophilisate Time 3 6 9 12 18 24 zero 1month months months months months months months Purity −70° C. 99.8%98.8% 98.8% 99.5% 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% (% −20° C. 99.8% 98.4% 98.5%96.0% 96.9% 97.1% area)  5° C. 99.8% 93.1% 54.8% 49.2%

Example 16

IPM IPM-Tris- Free acid IPM-Tris salt IPM-Lysine Mannitol Condition(API) (API) Injectable Injectable Current Stability Data No change in Nochange in No change in No change in Summary purity at purity at purityat purity at −70° C., 2 years 5° C., 3 mo. −70° C., 2 years 5° C., 1year Long-Term Storage −70° C. 5° C. −70° C. 5° C. TemperatureSolubility at 25° C. 14 mg/ml ~1400 mg/ml 20 mg/ml 80 mg/ml1 (saline)Reconstitution NA NA <40 seconds <30 seconds Solubility TimeReconstitution Stability NA NA 45 minutes 2.5 hours at 25° C. Stabilityin 250 ml 0.9% NA NA >90% potency for >90% potency for saline 15 min 45min pH 3.02 NA 8.5 5.0

EQUIVALENTS

Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain usingno more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to thecompounds and methods of use thereof described herein. Such equivalentsare considered to be within the scope of this invention and are coveredby the following claims.

All of the above-cited references and publications are herebyincorporated by reference.

1. A crystalline compound comprising IPM or an analog thereof, having astructure of formula (I)

wherein A⁺ is a hydroxylated aliphatic amine or an ammonium species; andX and Y independently represent leaving groups.
 2. A crystallinecompound of claim 1, wherein A⁺ is selected from selected frommono-,bis- or tris-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, 2-hydroxy-tert-butylamine,N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane(Tris), and the conjugate acid of Tris.
 3. (canceled)
 4. A crystallinecompound of claim 1, wherein X and Y are independently halogen, orwherein X and Y are both Cl. 5-6. (canceled)
 7. A crystalline compoundof claim 1, wherein the IPM or analog thereof and the ammonium speciesare present in a ratio from 2:1 to 1:2 or 1:1.
 8. (canceled)
 9. Acrystalline compound of claim 1, wherein the melting point of thecrystalline compound is about 103 to about 106° C. or is 105 to 106° C.10. (canceled)
 11. A crystalline compound of claim 1, wherein thecrystalline compound comprises a single polymorphic form of crystals.12-19. (canceled)
 20. A method for treating a hyperproliferativedisorder, comprising administering a crystalline compound of claim 1.21. A method of claim 20, wherein the hyperproliferative disorder isselected from acute leukemias, chronic leukemias, polycythemia vera,lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma,Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, heavy chain disease, myelodysplasticsyndrome, hairy cell leukemia, myelodysplasia, sarcomas and carcinomas,synovioma, mesothelioma, Ewing's tumor, leiomyosarcoma,rhabdomyosarcoma, colon carcinoma, lymphoid malignancy, pancreaticcancer, breast cancer, lung cancers, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer,hepatocellular carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma,adenocarcinoma, sweat gland carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma,papillary carcinoma, papillary adenocarcinomas, medullary carcinoma,bronchogenic carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, hepatoma, bile ductcarcinoma, choriocarcinoma, Wilms' tumor, cervical cancer, testiculartumor, bladder carcinoma, and CNS tumors.
 22. A lyophilisate comprisingIPM or an analog thereof, having a structure of formula (I)

wherein A⁺ is a hydroxylated aliphatic ammonium counterion or anammonium species; and X and Y independently represent leaving groups.23. A lyophilisate of claim 22, wherein A⁺ represents a protonated amineselected from selected from mono-, bis- or tris-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine,2-hydroxy-tert-butylamine, N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine,tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), and the conjugate acid of Tris.24. (canceled)
 25. A lyophilisate of claim 22, wherein X and Y areindependently halogen, or wherein X and Y are both Cl. 26-27. (canceled)28. A lyophilisate of claim 22, wherein the lyophilisate furthercomprises an excipient.
 29. A lyophilisate of claim 22, wherein A⁺represents an ammonium species selected from the protonated (conjugateacid) or quaternary forms of aliphatic amines and aromatic amines,including basic amino acids, heterocyclic amines, substituted andunsubstituted pyridines, guanidines and amidines. 30-32. (canceled) 33.A pharmaceutical composition adapted for oral administration, comprisinga pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or excipient and a compound of theformula

wherein A⁺ represents a hydroxylated aliphatic ammonium counterion or anammonium species; and X and Y independently represent leaving groups.34-36. (canceled)
 37. A pharmaceutical composition of claim 33, whereinA⁺ represents a protonated amine selected from selected from mono-, bis-or tris-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, 2-hydroxy-tert-butylamine,N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane(Tris), and the conjugate acid of Tris. 38-44. (canceled)
 45. A methodof improving the efficacy of a chemotherapeutic agent, comprisingadministering the chemotherapeutic agent in combination with a compoundof claim
 1. 46. A method of claim 45, wherein the chemotherapeutic agentis selected from docetaxel and doxorubicin. 47-49. (canceled)
 50. Alyophilisate of claim 28, wherein the excipient is mannitol.
 51. Apharmaceutical composition adapted for oral administration of claim 33,wherein A⁺ represents an ammonium species selected from the protonated(conjugate acid) or quaternary forms of aliphatic amines and aromaticamines, including basic amino acids, heterocyclic amines, substitutedand unsubstituted pyridines, guanidines and amidines